Saturday, March 17, 2018

Thinking Less of Jesus

Even writing a title like this seems strange to me. That is because for me and for many others Jesus of Nazareth, the one about whom the four most likely authentic "Great Messages" by John, Luke, Mark, and Matthew are written, is one whom we consider a "holy" figure. But no one is required to call Jesus "holy," or "God," or "a god." Some claim he was only a human prophet; some believe he never existed; some say he existed only in the mind of God, or as God's "plan."

However you personally understand this Jesus from the biblical histories, when it comes to me, and the group I started, Christian Witnesses of Jah (CWJs), we believe Jesus was born through Mary as taught in biblical record (Luke 1:34-35). We believe God put Jesus’ prehuman consciousness into flesh (John 1:1, 14; Philippians 2:5-8), and he grew into a child (Luke 2:48-51), and then into a man.--Luke 3:23.

We believe this was done, in part, because God chose to carefully manage this transfer of Jesus' prehuman spirit consciousness into a specific human lineage that would provide the right body in which, we also believe, Jesus lived and died.—Luke 3:23-38; Matthew 1:1-16; Romans 1:3; Colossians 1:18-19; 2:8-9; Hebrews 10:5; 10:10.


No one today or to this point understands how this is done on the metaphysical to the physical plane. How could we, since no human today has a conscious understanding of metaphysics, or how things like this type of life or consciousness transfer from a spirit to a human could work. On the other hand, today we are, some might say, dangerously close to uploading our consciousness into another form. Therefore, it should hardly surprise anyone CWJs believe in Jesus' prehuman consciousness as a spirit being which was, in some sense we do not fully understand, "downloaded" into a real human being, one born of woman.

For these reasons, today CWJs' view of Jesus' prehuman and human life might not be so difficult to grasp on this plane. In any case, we do not speculate. CWJs base our views of Jesus on the histories which best contain his teachings, and those which precede his human life though they appear to speak about someone like him (Deuteronomy Chapter 18; Proverbs 8:21-31; Micah 5:1-4; Daniel 7:13-14; John 1:18; 8:58; Colossians 1:15-17; Revelation 3:14). Yet, even where it concerns these texts some who believe in the biblical documents, including these texts, do our share our view. 

I am not upset by this nor do I think less of people simply because they do not share my view of Jesus. Each adult must be accountable for his or her own views. Based on experience, I fully expect and I prepare for the likelihood that many if not most people I meet will not share my view of Jesus. At least not right now.

However, as I wrote in my CWJs and the Trinity article, I would prefer a belief in God that uses a Trinitarian metaphysic or an understanding of "God" which attempts to make sense of the teaching of monotheism, generally described as the belief in "one God" (Deuteronomy 6:4; 1 Corinthians 8:4), than I would accept views which take away from how Jesus is described in the biblical writings or, even more so, over views by non- or by anti-Christians which ignore or which actively disrespect his person or his name.

Yet, when it comes to Jesus this is an area where CWJs, Trinitarians, and other groups like the Watchtower get into areas of disagreement, though in such a situation CWJs and Jehovah's Witnesses would likely see eye-to-eye on most issues pertaining to "God," except for where it concerns allowances of views on the Holy Spirit. All three groups would be acceptable to CWJs in the sense in which they view "God." Still, this would not be the case when it comes to how most if not all Trinitarian groups and those in the Watchtower would view CJWs, that is, in terms of what you can or cannot accept about “God.”

Therefore, when I write (as I did) about others who, by comparison to CWJs, Trinitarians, and the Watchtower think "less" of Jesus, I mean those persons/groups, for example, Jews or Muslims, who do not share our view of Jesus in the sense in which he existed before becoming a man. In spite of this, I would not hesitate to work with Muslims, for example, if we were being attacked by Jews or by any other group because of our view of Jesus as a holy figure, or as a prophet of God.

Though CWJs and Muslims also do not share the same view of Jesus, we both accept him, at very the least, as a prophet of God. Non-Christian Jews who accept the biblical documents in their worship or religious practice do not accept Jesus as CWJs or as Muslims do, and they reject him as the Messiah. But even though I disagree with such a view of Jesus, CWJs and Jews have a lot in common otherwise, particularly when it comes to biblical history before Jesus. 


So there are circumstances when, for one reason or another, a person's view of a special figure or of God can more or less, bring otherwise divided people or groups together, such as for a common defense or to promote a shared view. Nothing I have ever written is meant to imply any kind of gathering together to harm any person or group. People and groups harm themselves by their own actions, or views, and how they handle the consequences. Still, I do feel a need to warn others about some of the dangers I believe all Christians face today due to our views of Jesus and God, at least potentially by some.

Defending one's self or group or teacher or God is an appropriate reason to work together with others who are similarly under attack, in spite of any other differences. But this is not meant to imply I or any other CWJ would or should, for example, view all atheists, Muslims, Jews, Wiccans, Luciferians (though here I believe there is reason for greater alertness, since Luciferianism appears to be anti-Christian, and so, discriminatory), or any other religious or non-religious person or group as a threat. Simply having a lesser view of Jesus would not change how I treat a person or a group. Not treating others the way I want to be treated, as a matter of practice, would run directly contrary to the third of CWJs' Three Things.--Matthew 22:35-40; Mark 12:28-34; Luke 10:25-28, 30-37; Romans 13:8-10; Galatians 5:14; James 2:8.

With this accepted, where it concerns being attacked, or appropriately defending ourselves or fighting back so evil people do not glory over unrighteousness to the detriment of righteousness, I would much prefer to do so with those who have a closer view of the one whom CWJs believe is God's Son, than I would spiritually trust others who have a lower view of Jesus in spite of having access to the same information I do. But I am talking here about working in defense or for a common religious cause, or helping those in need. I am not referring at all to how we should treat others we meet in life, or at work, or who do not attack us for our faith, or who simply have their own belief about Jesus and about life in general.

Just know this: CWJs have a view of Jesus, too. So if we can respect each other, including how we view so-called "holy" figures, whether it is how you view yourself or another religious figure, or God, I am sure we will all get along much better in spite of any differences, if we try and if we realize we do not have to agree on everything in order to co-exist without discrimination, for as long as God permits it.--Proverbs 16:7; Matthew 5:9; Romans 12:18.

Monday, March 12, 2018

Christian Witnesses of Jah and the Trinity

I've received some odd feedback from some who see my "Signs in Sun and Moon and Stars" article as an acceptance, or me being "open" to Trinitarianism. I never wrote this, and anyone who suggests this is either naïve or deceiving you.

Still, apparently some are more alarmed by their own misunderstanding of my view of the Trinity than they are concerned about what I wrote regarding MS, SM, and SMS groups and people! Obviously, any person who reads my "Sun and Moon and Stars" article and whose main or only concern after doing so is whether I am "open" to the Trinity missed the whole point of that article, and may even be sympathetic to those want to continue to divide Christianity, making it an easier MS, SM, and SMS target.

Again, many people act like Christians; but they only really want to argue about God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. That is not the sign of a Christian. So I rarely waste time with people anymore who only want to waste my time re-hashing already-debated topics. The evidence is readily available. Each person can accept or reject it.

For the record, I never wrote I am "open" to Trinitarianism as some seem to think. In fact, I was very clear in my "Signs in Sun and Moon and Stars" article CWJs do not promote Trinitarianism.

However, I personally believe the Trinity, as traditionally understood, is a better understanding of God/Jesus/Holy Spirit than those views which demean Jesus (like MS, SM, and SMS persons and groups) or which do not give him enough glory, like most so-called Christian groups who deny Jesus' conscious pre-human existence today, similar to Islam, which views Jesus as human prophet. Still, I do not expect or require each person with whom I associate to hold the same view as I do about Jesus. I only expect my brothers and sisters in CWJ faith to hold to the same view, as it is one of Three Things we believe in above everything else.

CWJS believe it is impossible to read the Bible and then to reasonably deny Jesus existed as a spirit before becoming a human. We understand other views and people are entitled to them. But I will not waste any more time arguing over what others can read for themselves in the Bible. I am not going to argue with anyone else claiming to be Christian if I can help it, since all such persons should already know what to do, what to believe, and they should be acting out their beliefs, not looking to argue with other professed believers in the Christ. That only makes it more difficult to reach non-believers, those most in need spiritually.

In closing, I would take the Trinity any day over those views of Jesus which demean him, or even over views which think less of him than I believe is warranted in light of the evidence. But the Trinity, in terms of its metaphysical concepts, is not my view of "God." I understand the Trinity, and I can see why some Trinitarians use it to help them understand biblical monotheism. However, that is not what CWJs use to understand monotheism/God as taught in the Bible.

Though I was pretty clear about this in my SMS article, there are some people who appear unable to read and to comprehend the meaning of words in their context. So I felt the need to explain this again, one more time.

Friday, March 9, 2018

"There Will Be Signs in Sun and Moon and Stars” (Jesus)—Luke 21:25

Jesus’ words from this biblical text could be interpreted as a reference to certain cosmic phenomena which Christians believe will occur when Jesus returns to bring God’s judgment, ushering in a new age.—Revelation 19:1-6.

But what if Jesus’ words refer to something else, or to something also?

What if these foretold “signs in sun and moon and stars” are not cosmic phenomena but, instead (or in addition), involve people who use these symbols to promote anti-Christianity, and to communicate with each other in ways detrimental to Christians world-wide?

This is not about a conspiracy; it about my experience over the past fifteen (15) years or so, which indicates this is happening regardless of whether Jesus spoke about it according to Luke 21:25.

I am not the first nor will I be the last to point out a pattern of cosmic symbols used by certain persons for a specific reason. The increasing use of so-called Illuminati and other Satanic symbols today is exploding. At the same time, I do not see enough attention being given to some of these symbols, specifically, those which involve a combination of the moon and stars (MS), the sun and moon (SM), and the sun and moon and stars (SMS).

In my experience, apart from a trendy, naïve adoption of these symbols, in almost every other instance where these symbols are used, there appears to be an interest in decreasing the reputation, influence, and even material possessions of Christians while at the same time increasing those of MS, SM, and SMS groups. Though this may seem simply to follow an unfortunate tendency among humans since the beginning of our documented history, it is much worse if the side being attacked or if any one person on the attacked side is unaware of what is happening to them.

After leaving the Watchtower in the early 2000s, through work and social involvements I met many people I did not know before, including many non-Christians. While this is not significant in and of itself today, what I did not realize was how many of these people were anti-Christians, or truly opposed to Christian or Judeo-Christian beliefs and practices. By the time I realized finally it, in some ways it was too late; in other ways, it was just in time.

Either way, this article is not meant to review my entire history. Rather, it is to explain what I have discovered in part since I became familiar with the use by some of MS, SM, and SMS imagery. First I will provide just a little more background so there is a better context to why this involves me.

I grew up around and eventually in the Watchtower Society. As a result, I have never been politically active. But I was very active with the Watchtower organization, and in doing my own work as a member of it. Now that I am not involved at all with that organization, I am not opposed to being involved with politics if it benefits humankind. However, I find my efforts are best spent openly supporting the biblical God Jah and belief in the one whom I believe God sent in fulfillment of the Mosaic Law, specifically Deuteronomy Chapter 18. That person, according to the evidence I have thoroughly considered, is Jesus.

Primarily for these reasons, I have tried to give them priority, and next my family, with little room or time for politics. I have been a Christian since at least 1990. Other than for a period of several years after leaving the Watchtower Society, I have remained a Christian. After leaving the Watchtower my work and my life in general brought me into contact with many persons who, though I tried to befriend socially and in common career objectives, I found to be working against me, in almost every possible way, from discrimination in the work place for my beliefs, to attempts to ruin my name and my means of survival, to undermining my religious beliefs, even interfering with my family.

I am not perfect, and I make mistakes just about every day. I do not set out to make mistakes, nor do I embrace my mistakes as a good thing when they happen. If I do something wrong I usually feel remorse, apologize, and try to fix things or change course. That is not how many MS, SM, and SMS people seem to think or act, and if you are a Christian you need to know this, since it could and likely will at some point directly affect you. In other words, many of those who use these symbols are not nice people, and certainly not when it comes to Christians, in my experience.  

This is why I say, regardless of the actual meaning of Jesus’ words in Luke 21:25, based on what I have experienced every Christian should be very careful, more so than usual, and do not be ignorant to those around you, or to what is going on at any moment. While Christians need to co-exist in the right way with all people according to the laws of our state, and more so according to the laws of God, we should not abandon our awareness of what others may do because we are Christian. Remember Jesus’ words: “You must become alert as snakes and innocent as doves.”—Matthew 10:16.

From what I have seen and experienced firsthand, these groups have determined to work together to overthrow or to take over American government, to undermine American businesses, especially insurance companies, and to bring down Christianity, all forms of it.

I have never worked with Protestant or with Catholic Trinitarian Christians, as I am not Trinitarian in how I view the metaphysics of God in the Bible. So usually we get caught up in that debate, which I regret, even if it has at times become necessary for both sides. But I most certainly believe in and I promote the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I believe this is important to explain because this article is primarily a warning to Christians, no matter your specific faith, though perhaps even more so if you are a Trinitarian since it appeared to me those are the majority of targeted groups and persons.

I will add I have never resisted Trinitarianism because I am anti-Christian. Just the opposite. In fact, while I do not believe all of the essential Trinitarian metaphysics are taught openly in the Bible, in my view this results in too much glory to Jesus, but since he is the “imprint of God” we are entering a discussion of metaphysical glory and greatness I am not willing to define and require beyond what is written (Hebrews 1:3). I will say I have come to accept Trinitarianism as a better alternative than those groups with views who give Jesus too little glory or no glory at all, and a much better alternative to those who oppose Jesus in any form, as appears to be the case with most if not all who knowingly promote MS, SM, and SMS imagery. 

Regardless, I am never going to stand against other Christians and on the side of anti-Christians, or on the side of those who promote anti-Christian ideas or beliefs. My group (the Christian Witnesses of Jah) does not require anyone to accept or to reject the Trinity; we are not an anti-Trinity group. We are a non-Trinitarian group who does not use the Trinity to promote the biblical God. However, if individual members choose to adopt a Trinitarian metaphysic for their own benefit in understanding monotheism or of certain biblical texts which Trinitarians believe support their belief, that is up to each person. My group simply does not require the Trinitarian metaphysic or promote it as a means of explaining biblical monotheism. That does not make us, nor should it make us, targets for manipulation by non-Christians against Trinitarian Christians. 

Now let me get to some of the evidence which shows people are actively trying to undermine Christianity and, in its place, to promote forms of Devil worship/Satanism/Baphometism, and the like, including the worship of Pan, all of whom are basically the same being or related to the same concept of serving one’s self, also known as Luciferianism. Everything I have experienced and observed for about (15) years tells me these people are knowingly using MS, SM, and SMS imagery to stimulate opposition to Christianity and to any form of Christian government and business. In part I believe this is so those not promoting these symbols can be identified and targeted or in some way not supported or hurt or at least weakened. 

Since many of these groups also operate based on racist motivation and/or a misperceived view of land-ownership in North America and elsewhere, they are easily manipulated against white American Christians. These means of inflaming a non-Christian’s spirit can then set people in opposition to those whom they blame for their problems, even non-white Christians. So there is a lot more behind the use of these images than a mere symbolic opposition to Christianity.

As for hiding MS, SM, and SMS symbols in plain sight throughout society and popular culture, I have probably seen two or three complete episodes of the 1994 to 2004 show Friends. Nevertheless, in those 2-3 viewings I noticed the promotion of witchcraft, the dumbing down of men, and a mockery of traditional gender roles. After going through various experiences with MS, SM, and SMS groups and people, I noticed the following add for a Friends show on Yahoo! (red circling added):


There is one item clearly out of place in this image from a Friends episode: an oddly drawn, framed picture on the wall behind the male actor. Notice it has about half of a sun and crescent moon, with stars around it. This is SMS imagery on full display, hiding in plain sight.

After noticing more and more MS, SM, and SMS symbols since my experiences in the mid-2000s, in 2014 I came across this trophy for a Southern California middle school drama club performance:

Southern California Middle School Trophy (2014)

Given my prior involvement with and my observations related to people who use SM, SMS, and/or MS imagery and symbols, this item caught my attention. It struck me also how one star appeared offset from the other three stars which align to form a crescent moon shape. I just could not shake the apparent association in this trophy with MS imagery.

Still, I try not to read into anything more than is clearly there. So I kept this item in mind, accepting its possible association with MS imagery. I also considered the possibility the trophy image unintentionally formed a crescent moon shape, together with stars. Then, not long after noticing the trophy image, I saw this picture while reading through Southern California online news:


Notice the clear depiction of a crescent moon with a three-star pattern aligned with a fourth star offset from the other three. Take a closer look:


Someone cared an awful lot about this MS symbol with a unique crescent moon and star alignment to permanently ink it next to her left eye. Notice again: three stars are in line with each other with one star offset from the other three, exactly as we see in the 2014 California middle school trophy.

Then, more recently, in December 2017, while flying on a plane from Texas to California I was watching part of the 2017 Paramount Pictures movie Transformers 5: The Last Knight. While watching, I observed this scene involving the famous actor Anthony Hopkins holding up a clock (red circling added):

Transformers 5: The Last Knight, Paramount Pictures (2017)

In my red circle you can plainly make out the famous actor holding a combination of an SM clock complete with moonbeams and sun flares or rays. But look at the same image again, this time with another part of it in my red circle:


Notice the image below the SM symbol, in the round shape of the clock’s open glass cover. It shows the actor’s hand curved in the shape of a crescent moon with three bullet holes in alignment and a fourth hole offset from the other three.

Those holes represent stars, and the actor’s hand is the crescent moon, just like we see in the Southern California middle school trophy, and just like we see in the eye-tattoo of the Southern California burglar suspect.

So there is clearly some intended meaning in this particular MS symbol involving a crescent moon and a 3+1 star pattern. Perhaps it has something to do with the caption of the scene in the above image from the movie. Or perhaps it simply once again represents an anti-Christian sentiment expressed in a place no Christian would expect, and which not one Christian would pay to see.

I do not believe anything involved with this MS scene in a big budget, blockbuster (even if a terrible) movie with a famous actor is unintentional. It is what you see, whether with my assistance or not, because that is what those who made this scene wanted to present, even if they also wanted to hide it in plain sight using the clock and the open glass cover with bullet holes in it to do it.

Given the three prior examples of a unique MS image with a particular 3+1 star pattern, in three entirely different areas of life (a middle school trophy, a burglar’s face tattoo, and an important scene in a big budget, big studio, big franchise film involving a famous actor), I was surprised but not shocked when I saw this “formation” called into being by Beyoncé as part of her 2016 Video Music Awards show:

Beyoncé performing at the 2016 Video Music Awards

You can see the dancers have formed the sun image by the position of their arms, torsos, and legs as they lie on the floor, all in a circle, with the lower half of the human circle extended to mimic sun flares and light, and with the upper half illuminated in a crescent shape by bright lights acting as the moon and moonlight. There are also three lights as stars in alignment along the bottom with Beyoncé as the fourth, offset star in the middle. Here is my mark-up of this image showing these items:


Now we have a middle school trophy, a burglar’s face tattoo, a scene from the big budget movie Transformers 5, and a formation by persons under control of one of the biggest R&B and pop singers of today in a major music awards show, all using a unique combination of MS, SM, and SMS imagery. I do not believe this is some kind of creative coincidence.

As is well-known, both Beyoncé and her husband Jay-Z regularly feature messages, dress, symbols, and lyrics (forward and backwards) in their so-called “art” or music which are openly anti-Christian. Rather than pollute this article with such lyrics and some truly disgusting images, for example, on Jay-Z’s shirts, if you are interested in them further you can easily find examples online. For now, just take a look at this extended view of Beyoncé’s final “formation” as it turned from full SMS imagery into this:

Beyoncé’s performance ending at the 2016 Video Music Awards

At the top in this image is the MS/SM/SMS symbol at the end of the show, with its light withdrawn, and clearly visible beneath it is a formation of an upside down cross, a common symbol of anti-Christianity.

Then there are these images, which make up only a very small part of other examples on TV and in popular films which promote MS, SM, and SMS symbolism (with red arrows and circling added):

Tangled, Walt Disney Pictures (2010)


Despicable Me 2, Universal Pictures (2013)



I Know What You Did Last Summer, Columbia Pictures (1997)



1980s MTV commercial with homosexual artist Boy George


Ouija, Universal Studios (2014)

And in case anyone needed to see a child’s version of a Ouija board, there is this:

The Conjuring 2, Newline Cinema (2016)

MS, SM, and SMS symbols are in use all over the place. They are used regularly in movies, at televised events, and sometimes in places you may not expect, often because they are hiding in plain sight and, therefore, they are not always easy to notice even when you are looking right at them.

For example, look at the front image of this popular Monster Energy beverage, which is part of a line of drinks introduced by the Hansen Natural Company starting in 2002:


This view of the can shows a couple items of note. There is the claw-mark logo which some believe is used to represent “666” in Hebrew letters (three waws ו ו ו). There is also an obvious use of a cross in the “o” of the word “Monster,” which turns upside down when you drink it. Apart from these things, nothing else really stands out. Now look at the front of the can again, this time flattened out:


You can probably make out the moon on the left and the sun on the right, with stars and even several ringed planets like Saturn visible along the left side. There are also two crescent moons on the upper left which make plain the larger crescent moon taking up most of the left corner, as shown here in my mark-up of the same image:


Someone clearly put a lot of thought into how this image looked on each side, and then also how it would look once flattened out. It clearly shows MS, SM, and SMS images. But, why? Why is it so important for the “Monster” brand to use what appears to be an indication of 666, and a cross depicted as a letter that turns upside down when you drink it, and which is filled with a variety of MS, SM, and SMS symbols?

I believe the answer is clear: The artist of this beverage’s can and/or others in the company approving it are promoting a form of anti-Christianity.

Then there is cat food, or at least one popular brand known as “Fancy Feast.” Take a look at this image of this flavor of dry variety cat food:


Now take a closer look at the cat food shapes from this bag (with red circling added):


Do cats care about the shape of their food? If so, they must like crescent moons and five-pointed stars!

Obviously, it is the humans who care about and who make the shapes of this cat food. Now I do not in this instance nor in any other know for sure what are the motives of the people behind these symbols, except where it involves my direct experience. Otherwise, I can only point out instances where they are used and explain my experiences with those who use them. I present the evidence I have found, how it relates to my experiences, and then leave it for each person to decide what it means, and what to do about it.

MS, SM, and SMS are being used everywhere, and this has been increasingly true for some time. It is also becoming more nuanced in use, and even openly promoted in places which have become suspect for all the wrong reasons. Consider the front sign of the now infamous Comet Ping Pong restaurant in Washington, D.C., related to the “Pizzagate” scandal (with red circling added):

Front sign for Comet Ping Pong in Washington, D.C.


This sign’s four MS images are similar not only to some of the examples I have presented, but they also closely resemble the same symbols in the nineteenth century image of the goat god Baphomet, also popularized by well-known occultist Aleister Crowley in the early twentieth century (with red circling added):

19th century Baphomet image created by Eliphas Levi


There is more to this, a lot more. I have spoken and written about some of it, and I have presented some further evidence to help explain some of my concerns: We have one or more groups of people regularly using MS, SM, and SMS symbols and hiding them in plain sight in what appears to be a joint effort to promote anti-Christianity.

Regardless of intent, these MS, SM, and SMS images in and of themselves often stand as a warning for Christians and for Jews, in as much as for thousands of years Judeo-Christian God worshippers have been warned about the veneration and use of symbols for the sun, moon, and stars (Deuteronomy 4:19; 17:3-5; 2 Kings 23:5; Isaiah 47:12-15). Instead of promoting any of them, I and other Christians choose to promote the one who, in our view, made them and everything else.—Psalm 148:1-6.

Sunday, December 31, 2017

The CWJ Argument for God's Eternal, Intelligent Existence

The primary CWJ argument for God's existence and identity is as follows, based entirely on the scientific method:

Life exists; life only, and always, comes from existing life (no exceptions, ever, and this happens every day, many times a day); therefore, since life only comes from already-existing life, life must be eternal, since we are here now; further, since everything alive or anything we have evidence to show once lived is also symmetrical in design with a functional purpose, eternal life must also be intelligent. This eternal, intelligent life is whom Christian Witnesses of Jah call "God," identified further throughout our human history by many forms of similar names, but the least disputed of which in our English language is "Jah."


The above argument is similar in part to Louis Pasteur's argument in terms of life coming from something or someone already alive (biogenesis). However, it does not appear Pasteur derived from this fact that life must, ultimately, also be eternal, since it can only come from existing life. Hence the argument against something or someone being eternal is defeated by our very own existence, and by the existence of anything alive, since life in any form could only be here now IF life is eternal. This is consistent with what we see every day, multiple times a day, and is in direct contradiction to the foolish, absolutely unscientific belief in the evolution of life from non-life.

(This argument was originally presented on this blog on January 13, 2010: http://elihubooks.blogspot.com/2010/01/origin-of-life-is-life-or-something-or.html.)

(This article was revised on June 5, 2018, as follows: The 4th bolded sentence was changed to: further, since everything alive or anything we have evidence to show once lived is also symmetrical in design with a functional purpose, eternal life must also be intelligent. )

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Me, You, and Go Do!

I have not been as active with this Blog this past year as I have in years past, for the simple reason it is not easy to keep current with writing articles for Blogs when there are so many other outlets to use, such as Facebook, the CWJ Forum, Twitter, and writings done offline for future publication.

Further, over the past several years I have been dealing with the fallout from my divorce to a woman who I believe is no longer supportive of and, in my view, even opposed to Christianity, which has brought great hardship on me and on our children. However, Jah is good, and with time all things pass or become more endurable. His Son is our best example in all things like this, and it is him I follow, no man, no woman, and no organization.

Also, as many former Watchtower Witnesses will tell you, leaving the Watchtower organization is very difficult, since it often causes the loss of friends, family, and isolation from faith-based activities for some time, and for some for all time, but for me only until I realized my faith never should have been dependent upon an organization in the first place, but always dependent solely on the best available reasons for belief in the God of Moses, Jah, and in he whom Moses spoke about as the one who would be "raised up" like him, as one greater than him (Deuteronomy Chapter 18), the Son of Jah himself who "became flesh and lived among us," leaving aside the "form of a god" and instead taking "a slave's form," that of "a man."John 1:1, 14; Philippians 2:6-7.

That is what happened to me, the loss of friends and family, everyone but my three children (about whom I will write later, as their faith and support is something I will always cherish), whom my ex-wife attempted to take away from me, but who failed to do so as the court recognized the absurdity of her claims. But loss of friends and family often results from being involved with people connected to the Watchtower Society.

Indeed, even during my divorce, not once did my family or my in-laws (all or most of whom are active Watchtower Witnesses) contact me to ask, "What's going on, Greg?" I guess they simply believed what they heard from others, rather than take the time to figure out for themselves what was really happening.Compare John 18:34.

In this I believe they failed in the most basic of Christian responsibilities, namely, going to the person with whom you have an issue and finding out from them first what they have to say, before passing judgment.Matthew 18:15-17.

That is not the Watchtower way, demonstrated every time they disfellowship or excommunicate someone without allowing others to learn first from the person what happened, with the entire congregation present, just as Jesus said should be done. Watchtower Witnesses are, or were, simply told the person is "disfellowshiped," leaving it to every Witness' imagination to figure out what actually happened. This is a terrible disservice to the person involved and to those then forced to wonder about what happened when they should have first-hand knowledge about all of it, from the person accused, and not only from his/her accusers.

That's not Christianity. It's control; it's manipulation; it's the very opposite of what Jesus taught us to do according to Matthew (cited above).

Many others have experienced difficulties as well, and for them like for me after facing such trials it can be very difficult to "go" forward, to "do" what previously was done only in association with many other people. I often hear from people about how they want to meet together in person, similar to how the Watchtower Society meets (as well as other groups), which I understand is beneficial to people and, certainly, meeting in person can help us to encourage each other in a manner different from, say, posting messages or sending emails, or simply writing articles.

I also frequently hear about "inactivity," for example, online at certain forums or discussion boards, as if occasional discussion is somehow insufficient when it comes to online association or involvement with others particularly, for us, with other Christians, since there is so much to do.Luke 10:2.

"Do." That one little word is so important, for it involves activity, usually, activity concerning what one already knows how to do. And that's just it: If you already know what to do, and how to do it, "go do!"

Adding "go" to "do" may seem redundant, but it actually adds emphasis to the beginning of the activity you choose to do, since often we know what to do and how to do it, but we do not "go" and "do" what we know.

Rather, I have found there is a tendency among many to "do" in a circle or, though knowing what to do and how to do it, often there is this circling around the question(s) at the heart of the activity, as if the continual justifying of what we know we should do is sufficient when it comes to actually 'doing' it.

Take meeting together in person. If that's what you believe you need to become more active in your spiritual life, or to help others in a more meaningful way, then "go do"!

If you can't bring together a group of people for personal study or reflection, does that stop you from ministering to others during the day, taking advantage of opportunities to defend Jah's name, his person, that he is the Creator, and what is the truth about his history of dealings on this planet?

If you have children, start there. If not, consider other family members, then look for still others who may be interested in truth, or who may simply need help which you can provide in imitation of Jesus, letting your "light shine" as he promised it would.Matthew 5:14-16.

If online association stalls because, well, we've asked and answered the same questions over and over and over again, does that keep you from using what you already know to teach others the truth about Jesus, who history shows him to be, who he claimed to be, his relationship to our salvation, and how he relates to the Law of Moses, another historical figure with a significant role in Jah's purposes?

What if you are all alone, perhaps with just one other person? Is that not enough for you to both show you believe in the Golden Rule, that you will treat others as you want to be treated, and to pray together with the spirit of Jah's Son, who took the time to make clear the fact he is present when any two people (yes, just two people) come together in his name?Matthew 18:20.

All of these things most anyone reading this post can "go do" right now, without anyone else, or in the last case with just one other person.

While more personal association can be a great thing, many of God's servants in the past have been alone or with only a few at times, including God's own Son, who had only 12 close followers, one of whom betrayed him.

Jah does not ever make numbers an issue when it comes to those who follow his Son, and his Son says "two or three" are enough to bring forth his spirit. He also sent forth his own disciples by "twos," not in large groups, to witness about him throughout various communities.Luke 10:1.

So don't think in terms of numbers when it comes to our Christian association online or offline. Quite frankly, the less "busy" Forums like this are the more I believe people are already doing what they know is right, versus simply continuing to question it as if they need a constant reminder of the realization we've already reached!

Instead of repeating things online or elsewhere, think, "Go do." I will, too. That is what makes this about "me, you, and go do!"

Of course, questions about things we may already know much about do have a place, but not as much of a place as I believe we often give them, that is, when we could “go do” what we already know is right and how to do it, such as ministering to or otherwise helping other in need spiritually or physically.

If we “go do” these things and limit our repetition of questions or discussions which have already been asked and answered or considered fully, then whether we are together or apart we will be “one” in spirit and in thought, whether we are only “two or three” or many more, just as the Son prayed for us to be!John 17:20-21.

I intend to be much more active on this Blog and elsewhere, particularly offline, so I can meet other people and actually talk to them in person, the best way I believe we can reach someone, or have a truly stimulating discussion. I encourage all of you to "do" the same, and to "go forth," as Jesus said.Luke 10:3.

Only as you do make sure to remain "cautious as serpents and innocent as doves," knowing "wolves" are among us, and they have no interest in anything but themselves. So they will cast you aside for practically anything, if you are not careful with whom you associate, whom you invite into your home, and whom you marry.—Matthew 10:16.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Evolution Issues: The Hawking Denial

Hawking said: "Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation." -- Chris Matyszczyk, "Stephen Hawking makes it clear: There is no God," CNET (September 26, 2014).
The last I checked "science" involves determinations made through repetition which produce the same results.

In the case of "God," we know we are here and we are alive. Further, "science" tell us (and rightly so) life can only come from preexisting life. In other words, something dead does not produce something alive.

It happens every day one way (life comes from something/someone already alive) and it never happens on any day the other way (life resulting from non-life).

Therefore, based on the scientific evidence presented to us every single day of our lives, and in no other way to the contrary, "life" must be eternal since it is here now and life can only come from preexisting or already existing life.

That this eternal life which must exist (because life exists) is also clearly intelligent is easy to show based on every single thing we can observe. Everything has structure, purpose, and design, from a cell to a human.

How, then, does one come to the conclusion as does Hawking, "God" (eternal, intelligent life) does not exist?

Answer: By imagining billions of years during which already existing matter is set in motion by a “Big Bang” in which "accidents" happen randomly to already existing (but non-living) matter.

For Hawking/evolutionists, non-living matter must also be eternal since nothing cannot produce something; yet, unlike an eternal, intelligent God, non-living eternal matter cannot, under any known condition or according to any presented experiment, produce life on its own. This is true and it will remain true no matter how many comets, asteroids, volcanoes, earthquakes, lightning or anything else you add to the mix, all of which tends to destroy not create, if anything.

None of these things, and certainly not “nothing,” could close up a cell wall, and this after making sure all of the cell parts are in place, working, and reproducing. And what about seeds and plants? How did instructions for plants get to be inside seeds?

The theory of evolution is now really nothing more than science fiction, a theory which in no way compares with the evidence on the side of God's existence. There is not an evolutionist alive on this planet who can defend its assumptions against the clear, repeated facts of real scientific study and thought. The only thing an evolutionist can do is assume premises and from these assumed premises conclude exactly as many scientists have assumed; in other words they are arguing circularly from conclusion to premise, not from premise to conclusion.

I can show by science, by repeated, daily experiment exactly where life comes from 100% of the time, and also where it does not come from 100% of the time. Hawking cannot show anything demonstrating evolution’s critical premise, namely, how life comes from non-life, let alone how so much life develops with so much utility.

"God" is not only based on the best available evidence, scientific evidence, it is clearly the only real explanation for why we are here and for why everything is as it is: Someone put everything together and someone set in motion the reproductive cycles which keep life going. That "someone" is eternal, intelligent life, or whom many call "God," and still others call "Jah" or "Jaho(h)-ah."

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Evolution Issues: Spider Fangs

Spiders have many incredible features, not the least of which is the strength and design of its web, and all of which indicate intelligence and intention, not accidental mutation.

Consider just one of the spider's features: Fangs.

Spider fangs clearly show a design perfectly suited for its capture/kill ability which helps control insect population and ensure the spider's own survival. Further on the evident design of spider fangs, here is a quote from a recent article about spider fangs:

The hollow, conical shape of the spiders' fangs gives them nearly optimal stiffness per unit volume — a measure of their resistance to deformation — making them ideally suited for piercing prey. The fangs are a composite of protein and chitin, a carbohydrate molecule found in the shells of many insects and crustaceans, whose microscopic structure is well suited for its purpose, the results suggest.--Tanya Lewis, "Why Spider Fangs Are Nature's Perfect Needles," LiveScience (May 27, 2014).
In fact, and as the above article goes on to suggest, spider fangs are so perfect they "might inspire scientists to develop better injection needles and other medical devices." So what we humans can or have made so far, with all of our technology and experience, still does not equate to what a spider's fangs can do.

So while the writer also repeatedly describes spider fangs as something which "evolved in nature," everything about spider fangs indicates just the opposite, namely, an intelligent, intentional design.

Accidents like spider fangs do not happen; they do not evolve from non-fangs or from something which is not already made to be what it is. In fact, the last mutation I saw, other than in recent (fantasy) X-Men movies, was about as useful as a wet towel coming out of the pool. Consider, for example, this description of a physical mutation (with underlining added):

Despite recent progress in defining the ciliome, the genetic basis for many cases of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) remains elusive. We evaluated five children from two unrelated, consanguineous Palestinian families who had PCD with typical clinical features, reduced nasal nitric oxide concentrations, and absent dynein arms. Linkage analyses revealed a single common homozygous region on chromosome 8 and one candidate was conserved in organisms with motile cilia. Sequencing revealed a single novel mutation in LRRC6 (Leucine-rich repeat containing protein 6) that fit the model of autosomal recessive genetic transmission, leading to a change of a highly conserved amino acid from aspartic acid to histidine (Asp146His). LRRC6 was localized to the cytoplasm and was up-regulated during ciliogenesis in human airway epithelial cells in a Foxj1-dependent fashion. Nasal epithelial cells isolated from affected individuals and shRNA-mediated silencing in human airway epithelial cells, showed reduced LRRC6 expression, absent dynein arms, and slowed cilia beat frequency. Dynein arm proteins were either absent or mislocalized to the cytoplasm in airway epithelial cells from a primary ciliary dyskinesia subject. These findings suggest that LRRC6 plays a role in dynein arm assembly or trafficking and when mutated leads to primary ciliary dyskinesia with laterality defects.--Struan Frederick Airth Grant, Ed., "LRRC6 Mutation Causes Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Dyneim Arm Defects," PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e59436, published online Mar 19, 2013.
In other words, mutations are defects, not indications of progress or advancement within a species, but usually signs of degeneration and loss of optimal performance; mutations never, ever lead to the development of a brand new species or a different family type of creature when they do occur, neither do they lead to a better-developed feature (such as spider fangs) of an existing creature like spiders. Therefore, describing something so perfect as spider fangs for what a spider does to survive and to better its environment as having unintelligently "evolved" is nonsense; it has no scientific basis, at all.

Yet, we humans design things similar to spider fangs (for example, injection needles), showing such devices are often the product of intelligent, intentional design.

Of course, even our intelligence cannot (yet) match that which we see in the spider's fangs; hence, we see the interest in Ms. Lewis' article to copy or to replicate as best as we can what it is spider fangs can do. That alone should tell us there is someone behind the design and the purpose of spider fangs, indeed, behind it should tell us the same thing about every single living creature since they all have similarly designed, well-suited features which allow them to survive, to thrive, and to contribute to its environment.

Intelligent design is scientific, as is the belief life only comes from preexisting life and, therefore, scientifically, "life" must be considered eternal.

How so?

Because intelligent design and life coming only from preexisting life both happen all the time, every single day, for everyone to see. New things are intelligently designed by humans and life continues to only come from preexisting life, in the case of every known life form, with no exceptions, other than those proposed by science apart from any actual evidence,but which propositions often provide evidence against the very conclusions they advance in the name of science. Spider fangs are just one example of this.